Valadao family

David Valadao and his family with then-Speaker John Boehner on the occasion of Valadao's 2013 swearing in.

Last week 10 immigration reform activists brought their case to the Hanford home of U.S. Rep. David Valadao.

“Valadao escucha! Estamos en la lucha!" they shouted into a bullhorn from across the street. Translated, "Valadao listen to us! We are in the fight!"

Valadao wasn't home. His wife, Terra, and their three kids were.

Understandably, he was upset. 

"Aggressive behavior like that demonstrated toward my family today has no place in our political system,” the 21st Congressional District representative declared in an email blast to media.

Valadao spokesman Cole Rojewski was more forceful.

“Hateful statements, divisive rhetoric, and aggressive behavior, especially directed at Congressman Valadao’s family, are completely unacceptable,” he said. “Intimidation tactics, such as those deployed today, are precisely what is wrong with American politics."

Kevin McCarthy, whose 23rd Congressional District abuts Valadao's from the south, can empathize. In February 2017, about 150 protesters marched from a nearby shopping center to his home near Cal State Bakersfield to demand that McCarthy hold a town hall meeting on the Affordable Care Act. (He didn't.)

They had announced their plans the day before and a group of McCarthy supporters was waiting for them. 

In both cases the protests remained peaceful. No fights, no threats, no vandalism.

But afterward, a different sort of debate ensued: Is it right for protesters to picket outside the homes of elected officials? Their spouses didn't run for office; they did. Their kids aren't voting on controversial legislation; they are. Shouldn't front-door protests be out of bounds?

Rojewski wasn't being melodramatic, at least not by much: These really are "intimidation tactics." Antonio Bernabe, the organizing director for CHIRLA, the civil rights group that targeted Valadao's home, said as much when he later told media that the objective was to make Valadao a little uncomfortable.

Why would Valadao be uncomfortable? Because he wasn't there to defend his family should things get out of hand? You bet.

The question is, now that they have Valadao's attention, is the congressman more likely to sit down with the activists for a face-to-face? Or less? My guess: Less.

But, though I don't condone these activists' strategy, I absolutely understand the frustration that drove them to it. They feel powerless, and protest feels like meaningful action.

They can march on their congressman's office, but if the lights are off and the doors locked when they get there, right in the middle of a bustling business day, the effort can seem a little hollow.

They can write impassioned letters to their congressman, but their chances of actually getting an audition with him are lotto-esque.

They can encourage their neighbors to register and hopefully vote every two years, but they'll never be able to bankroll the sort of advertising campaign that powerful opponents can finance.

So they protest.

And the thing is, protest can be effective. Public demonstrations have hastened everything from women's suffrage to AIDS research, helped drive from office at least two presidents (Herbert Hoover and Lyndon Johnson), and ended at least one war. And that's just in the past 100 years.

The private residence protest is a less memorable and certainly less effective subset. Valadao and McCarthy are in good company: Watergate-era Attorney General John Mitchell, former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, former Secretary of State John Kerry, former Vice President Dick Cheney, first daughter Ivanka Trump, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, U.S. Sen. Chuck Schumer and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi have all experienced protests outside their homes. There's no record of any of them having changed their position on an issue as a result.

But voters who care so much about issues like immigration and health care that they're willing to march in the street deserve at least some acknowledgment, and acknowledgment has been tough to come by lately.

Members of Congress have almost entirely eliminated the town hall meeting from their tool belt of constituent services, and the result for many voters has been frustration and a sense of disenfranchisement.

Yes, I know town halls can get loud and raucous and rarely inspire movement that satisfies the disaffected. I know that, poorly managed, they can present security issues. But they remind all parties, both elected and electing, that individual voices still matter.

The way money has taken over politics today, though, you wouldn't know it.

Protesting outside of a congressman's home is the wrong approach, but congressmen need to have some appreciation for the sense of helplessness that inspires it.

Contact The Californian’s Robert Price at 661-395-7399, rprice@bakersfield.com or on Twitter: @stubblebuzz. His column appears on Sundays, Wednesdays and Saturdays; the views expressed are his own.

(10) comments

Tam Daras

Amendment 1
- Freedom of Religion, Speech, and the Press

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, or abridging the freedom of speech or of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

Nevermind

When did Kern County move to Nebraska?

Humano

Public officials. Public street. Public protest. It's fair.

Grancer

Protesters harassing individuals and/or their families by blasting them with loud noise making devices or simply screeching at them vocally is disturbing the peace and should be handled accordingly by policing departments. Allowing these incidents to continue without penalty is completely unacceptable. Even the most obtuse among us, excepting progressive liberals of course, understands that unrestrained lawlessness always leads to more of the same. Progressively larger fines plus jail time for repeat offenses will stop this nonsense, even by those that can comfortably pay the fines.

HeresJohnny

I'm Not a fan of anybody in Congress, but I strongly dislike the protesters even more. Tell your story while you're walking...

GaryJohns

More whining and blubbering from Bobby Price. Liberals can always "absolutely understand the frustration that drove them to it"....unless the shoe is on the other foot. We conservatives in Kern County would like to march on someone's house to protest OUR disenfranchisement in California Politics. Liberal pant loads at all levels of state politics pay no attention to us. Who whines for us, Bobby?
No one wears the victim label better than liberals and Bobby is their local emperor. Go peddle your "frustration" to someone else.

Carlos24

As McCarthy's office doors are always locked when anyone wants to talk to him,
i would seem that showing up at his house is the only way folks can express their
views.

Nevermind

Not a fan of Valadao, but families should be off limits. Unless its the Trump family, they should be in prison.

GaryJohns

How about the Clinton Family?

Nevermind

Most investigated couple in history yet
Nada. If their proven guilty, hang em. Now then, if Trump is found guilty?

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.