Pesticide regulations scheduled to take effect Jan. 1 in Kern County are expected to have a substantial negative impact on local crop production.

Rules disclosed Friday by the county's top agricultural official will govern the use of chlorpyrifos, a potent toxin widely used on almonds, citrus, cotton and other commodities. The chemical is believed to damage infants' brains.

A ban on aerial application of the chemical will be the most significant permitting condition being instituted by Kern Agricultural Commissioner Glenn Fankhauser, whose action was based on state recommendations. The pesticide will no longer be permitted for use on most crops, and new buffer zones are also being put in place that, at a minimum, will require new coordination among growers.


Chlorpyrifos (pronounced klor-PEER-ih-foss) spraying has declined statewide in recent years, including in Kern, which in 2016 made greater use of the chemical than any other county in California. But how much of the pesticide is used in any given year is generally dictated by weather and field conditions.

Kern County farmers used 203,401 pounds of chlorpyrifos in 2016, according to the state Department of Pesticide Regulation. That was 38 percent less than in 2013, but 12 percent more than in 2012.

Environmentalists argue the chemical, produced by the Dow Chemical Co., should be taken off the market entirely after scientists for three California agencies concluded it is toxic and unsafe for use at any level. It has been found in trace levels in drinking water.

Last year, more than three dozen Kern County farmworkers were accidentally exposed when chlorpyrifos drifted from neighboring farms. Some of the workers became nauseous, vomited and were given medical treatment.


Fankhauser said the new permit conditions will mean less of the pesticide will be applied locally, which will lead to diminished harvests and reduced profitability for Kern growers.

"Ultimately that is the dilemma," he said.

Several officials with the Kern County Farm Bureau did not respond to requests for comment about the county's new chlorpyrifos permit restrictions.

Representatives of The Wonderful Co., a major grower of nuts and citrus and one of Kern's largest crop producers, also did not respond to a request for comment.

Because there has long been discussion about limiting use of the pesticide, Fankhauser said, industry should not be surprised by the new limitations. He expressed hope growers have worked on finding other chemicals that might be substituted.


He said a big complication in the new rules will result from the requirement that growers spraying as much as 40 acres at a time will have to create a quarter-mile buffer that cannot be touched for 24 hours afterward. That means a neighboring farmer won't be able to do work such as spraying or even irrigation until a full day later.

"There's going to be a competition of who gets in there first and who's able to treat," he said.

The new rules will certainly create a hardship for almond growers, who in many cases have no viable pesticide alternative, said Gabriele Ludwig, the Almond Board of California's director of sustainability and environmental affairs.

The quarter-mile buffer zone is of particular concern for growers, she said.

"The reality of the matter is you basically would need to ensure that there's no activities going on within a quarter-mile around that site," she said.

"If you own the property it might be easier, but ... many times you don't necessarily own the property. And certainly if you own a home or any residence in between, that surely would (restrict) your ability to apply chlorpyrifos."

John Cox can be reached at 661-395-7404. Follow him on Twitter: @TheThirdGraf.

(3) comments

Sr Tito

In my opinion, the Bakersfield Californian hit a home run when reporter John Cox recently wrote about the upcoming agricultural restrictions on the insecticide called chlorpyrifos. As I recall, the ground breaking report published in April 2014 by the California Health Tracking Program (CEHTP) - Agricultural Pesticide Use Near Public Schools in California, identified statewide the schools within a ¼ mile that were near production crop fields sprayed with known pesticides. As a brief recap, this report identified the use of agricultural pesticides statewide near public schools (K-12) for the 2010 school year which amounted to approximately 2,511 public schools.

FYI, chlorpyrifos has a chem code 00253 as labeled by the Ca. Dept. of Pesticide Regulation (CDPR), and based on CDPR’s search site for chemical ingredient by partial name or chemical code (, this insecticide has a EPA signal word level of “warning” due to its toxicity levels.

Incidentally, there are generally three EPA signal word levels – danger, warning, caution. In addition to the warning label, this insecticide has special status – restricted material, federally restricted, and California restricted. According to the CDPR site, some potential known health hazards from exposure are: skin and eye irritations, and the insecticide may be fatal if swallowed.

The CEHTP public document has detail information for Kern County. Based on the research data tables from the public statewide pesticide use reporting (PUR) system, CEHTP findings indicate about 632 pounds of chlorpyrifos were used in the 2010 school year within Kern County adjacent to public schools. School populations that were within the ¼ mile buffer area of PUR chlorpyrifos applications totaled about 12,421 enrolled students with the vast majority being minority students. For Kern County, the report showed that these PUR applications (about 110) which occurred in 2010 in close proximity to public schools were adjacent to eighteen K-12 student sites or within thirteen school districts. I assume Kern is just one of many CA counties that experienced similar chlorpyrifos applications in 2010 in close proximity to public schools.

Even though it is assumed chlorpyrifos applications near sensitive receptor sites like schools or day care centers has decreased in 2018, the CDPR made the right call in adding restrictions to the use of this highly toxic insecticide. I believe the next big challenge for residents, school administrators, growers and regulators will be documenting and enforcing “compliance” for these new regulations.

Happy New Yr! Tito


"Ultimately that is the dilemma," he said....huh?.....figure out a safer way to farm...I mean really....

Muhammad Fatwa al Jihad

Profits before people? Kern County is full of rich farmers who don’t give a rats patootie about anything other than their bottom line. I was raised on a farm in the 60s and 70s. My Dad believed that the use of chemicals then, mostly banned now, helped kill my Mom with cancer. I was hit with Parathion, a pesticide known for debilitating effects. John Oglesby, the Entomology teacher at BC had physical problems from overexposure to Parathion.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.