1209582780-data.jpg-3 (copy)

Detainees at the Mesa Verde Detention Facility are paid to work in the facility. In this file photo, these men work in the laundry room to earn a little money.

A new law may result in the closure of the Mesa Verde ICE Processing Facility in Bakersfield, although experts say the federal immigration agency could find a workaround to keep the detention center open.

State lawmakers passed the Dignity Not Detention Act in 2017, which prevents cities and counties from entering into contracts with federal agencies or private corporations for the purpose of housing noncitizens in detention.

“This law was pretty groundbreaking,” said Liz Martinez , director of communications for Freedom for Immigrants, a nonprofit organization that advocated for the bill. “It stops any sort of local governments in being complicit in the creation of new contracts.”

That could be bad news for ICE, which houses immigrants in Mesa Verde through a complex network of agreements that could now be in jeopardy due to the new law.

ICE entered into a contract, known as an intergovernmental service agreement, with the city of McFarland in 2015 to use the detention facility located in Bakersfield.

“They are very, very common,” said Susan Long, co-director of Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse, known as TRAC, an organization at Syracuse University that tracks immigration statistics across the United States. “It turns out that this is a source of revenue that some counties and cities rely on.”

Since 2015, ICE has paid McFarland about $35,000 a year, and in return, McFarland has contracted Geo Group Inc., a private prison company, to detain immigrants for ICE.

All was going well until the McFarland City Council voted in closed session about three months ago to pull out of the agreement, providing no explanation for their decision.

The decision will take effect near the end of March, and it appears to put ICE on a collision course with the Dignity Not Detention Act. The new law seems to prevent the federal agency from partnering with the county or any city in California to keep Mesa Verde open.

“It definitely changes the future of the facility,” Martinez said.

Neither ICE nor Geo returned requests for comment.

The law also prevents immigrant detention centers that have contracts with cities and counties from expanding, which is potentially important in Bakersfield.

Geo recently purchased and demolished the Bakersfield Dome, which was next to its facility on Golden State Avenue. Since the purchase, rumors have swirled that the company plans to use the land for additional detainee housing.

Geo has denied the rumors, and the law seems to indicate they could not expand even if they wanted to.

But despite the new law, many wonder how it will apply in the Mesa Verde case.

“It would be unfortunate, but not out of character, for these private prison companies to circumvent state laws,” Martinez said.

Long said ICE could directly contract with a private prison company like Geo to run a detention facility, potentially allowing Mesa Verde to stay open.

Mesa Verde is one of 10 detention facilities used by ICE in California, according to ICE’s website.

It houses 300 men and 100 women in various stages of the immigration legal process. Some in the facility are in the process of applying for asylum, although not all, volunteers who visit Mesa Verde say.

If Mesa Verde closed, the detainees would most likely be housed in a different facility elsewhere in the state, potentially farther away from family, friends, lawyers and the site of their legal proceedings.

You can reach Sam Morgen at 661-395-7415 or smorgen@bakersfield.com. You may also follow him on Twitter @smorgenTBC.

(4) comments

REMUDA

Work to put the so-called "Detention Centers" back near the border, where the crimes originate. Best location? Open country, away from population centers. Sheriff Joe had the right idea. Oh yeah . . . and Travis Allen is back with 'TAKE BACK CALIFORNIA PAC' . . . as a start . . . !

CaSooner

Let Kern County be a law abiding county. Illegal immigrants broke US law and therefore must be treated as such. We the US of A should not be harboring fugitives nor promote further illegal immigration by letting current law breakers go unpunished. This is why we need the wall. Once border security is achieved, only then we can have a legitimate discussion around the 11 million illegal immigrants.

REMUDA

Roger that . . . ! These are FED CRIMINALS, not local 'RESIDENTS'. We'd need fewer Bako and KCSO Officers if the 'Illegal Aliens' were nearer the border in remote ICE desert 'camps'. It's more cost effective to 'transport' to court than local 'house or keep'.

jtorczon

Do whatever it takes to keep the place open. We can’t be having illegal immigrants running around loose and not showing up for their court hearings, especially those identified as criminals by the feds. I would hope that the local arrest of the bad hombre accused of killing the cop in Newman would cause a serious rethinking of these stupid sanctuary laws.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.