california aqueduct

The California Aqueduct near Patterson in 2019.

A new set of water regulations aimed at protecting California’s native fish came down from the state earlier this week to near universal condemnation from both agricultural and environmental water folks.

The regulations are contained in a 143-page “incidental take permit” issued by the state Department of Fish and Wildlife that lays out when — and how much — water can be pumped out of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta by the State Water Project.

Agricultural contractors who get water from the project fear they could lose up to 300,000 acre-feet a year under the new permit.

Environmentalists say the permit gives a “free pass” to pumpers and is a path to extinction for native fish.

For Central Valley water users, the new regulations come at an already difficult time as they struggle to reconcile excessive groundwater pumping with dwindling surface supplies.

“Our concern is, if (state and federal water users) are, collectively not meeting delta requirements under this permit, the State Water Contractors will have to make up for the federal side making our deliveries worse,” said Jason Gianquinto, general manager of the Semitropic Water Storage District in northwestern Kern County.

Semitropic, alone, has a 300,000 acre-foot groundwater overdraft that it’s trying to fill.

Karla Nemeth, director of the Department of Water Resources, which runs the State Water Project, understood the challenges faced by ag water users, but felt concerns about this new permit are overblown.

“What’s happening with some State Water Contractors (being upset) is they are looking at the federal biological opinions that would have enabled them to export more water,” Nemeth said.

“This permit doesn’t allow for that water to be exported. It reallocates it to environmental uses.”

She referred to biological opinions released by the Trump administration last fall and enacted after a campaign-style rally by President Donald Trump himself in Bakersfield on Feb. 19.

Those biological opinions relaxed some guidelines for how much water could be pumped out of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta.

In past years, the biological opinions have acted as the main governing documents for how the state and federal Bureau of Reclamation jointly operate the delta.

The state sued over those opinions and, on Tuesday, issued its own permit for delta operations.

Brent Walthal, assistant general manager for the Kern County Water Agency, wasn’t surprised by the new permit, which has been in the works since last May. The Kern County Water Agency administers state water contracts that account for about a million acre-feet on behalf of 13 agricultural water districts and is the second largest contractor on the State Water Project.

He anticipated the new permit would reinstate guidelines from the 2008 federal biological opinions, which, in some cases it does. That includes restablishing flow requirements on the San Joaquin River, which he said could reduce exports to State Water Contractors by up to 150,000 acre-feet a year.

Add to that two new environmental set-asides of close to 130,000 acre-feet a year and the total potential reduction could be 300,000 acre-feet a year, he said.

“Modelers are still poring over this to try and understand exactly what it will mean to us,” Walthal said.

Nemeth described the permit as “export neutral,” when looking at it through the 2008 biological opinions.

She and Department of Fish and Wildlife Director Chuck Bonham both pointed to the permit’s advantages to water contractors, especially in wet years.

Such as a cap on environmental outflows and moving the Fall X2 line closer to the delta.

The Fall X2 line is where salty water from the San Francisco Bay meets fresh water from the delta. That line had been required to be held at 70 kilometers, or about 43 miles, away from the Golden Gate Bridge, which required heavier flows coming out of the delta.

The permit now allows it to be 80 kilometers, or about 50 miles, from the bridge, Bonham said.

“That’s huge,” he said. “That alone, in wet years, will result in higher exports.”

He joked that he would love to see a letter to the editor in The Californian thanking the state for finally moving the Fall X2 line, something water contractors have lobbied for for years.

Those and other parts of the permit were roundly criticized by multiple environmental groups, according to a March 31 blog post by Doug Obegi, a lead attorney for the Natural Resources Defense Council.

“While the State’s permits are not identical to the Trump Administration’s plan for extinction, they share many of the same problematic elements,” he writes.

He predicts multiple groups will sue over the permit.

Indeed, the Metropolitan Water District, the State Water Project’s largest contractor, already has an agenda item on its April 14 meeting to discuss moving ahead with a lawsuit over the permit.

Lois Henry is the CEO and editor of SJV Water, a nonprofit, independent online news publication dedicated to covering water issues in the San Joaquin Valley. She can be reached at lois.henry@sjvwater.org. The website is sjvwater.org.

(2) comments

Comment deleted.
Desperado

What is a "desolation plant" some kind of flower ??

Comment deleted.
Boogerface Nutter

Really? Sure, there are some zillionaires who flaunt the water crises by using thousands of gallons of water on their huge estates.

I live in a neighborhood where the average 30x90 foot lot goes for about 4 million dollars. We have two-gallon buckets in the shower to capture cold water until warm water comes out. That goes into the garden. We have brick for a lawn. The overwhelming majority of homes around us have no grass or artificial grass.

I come to Bakersfield, where I still have a house, and see people watering lawns in the middle of the day. Giant grass water sucking lawns.

I've watched several of our neighbors dumping those same 2-gallon buckets on their flowers.

So many more people here in the LA area have taken up the grass and have put in native, drought tolerant plantings on the lawn. We had water restrictions that allowed us to run our water systems two days per week between 6 and 9am for 20 minutes total. That's all stations a total of 20 minutes. Did you ever have those restrictions in the land where the Kern comes down? I think not. I did set the timers on my rental house in Bako to water only enough to keep the grass sort of green and no winter rye for me.

I'd say to look at your own city before looking down here. LA is an easy target. Every time I'm in Bako and see the water waste, I keep thinking "These people live in a dream world"

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.