A nonprofit government watchdog group has filed a formal complaint with the inspector general of the Department of Veterans Affairs alleging that House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy has exercised improper influence over the bidding process for a long-delayed VA health clinic in Bakersfield.

The letter, sent by Washington, D.C.-based Campaign for Accountability and addressed to VA Inspector General Michael J. Missal, claims the Bakersfield Republican actively promoted a clinic development proposal from San Diego-based SASD Development Group over another proposal by the owners of the current clinic on Westwind Drive.

In its letter, Campaign for Accountability asks the inspector general to "investigate discrepancies" in the competitive bidding process. "Evidence suggests," the letter continues, "House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy may be improperly exerting influence, upending the regular decision-making process."

Brittany Martinez, a spokeswoman for McCarthy's office, flatly denied the allegation.

"First and foremost, the congressman's ultimate goal is to ensure that our veterans can receive the long-awaited care they rightfully deserve, and soon, particularly as a new clinic was authorized by Congress in 2009," Martinez said in an email. The process of awarding a contract to build a new community-based outpatient clinic in Bakersfield, she said, "is up to the VA in determining the merits and eligibility."

SASD was awarded a contract in September 2018 to build a new clinic, Martinez said.

"The aforementioned complaint mentions dates approximately a year after the lease was already awarded by the VA. At no time did the congressman advocate for any party while the VA was processing bids, and only after the VA determined and announced the award in 2018 was the congressman's office ever in touch with or aware of SASD."

In its complaint, the group refers to a letter sent Sept. 4, 2019, from a representative of SASD to McCarthy briefly describing the history of the company’s experience.

"Notably, the person who signed the letter, Steven Doctor, did not include his position with the company," the complaint states, "and closed stating, 'We do appreciate all of the help your office has provided along the way,' indicating the company and Mr. Doctor had been in regular contact with Rep. McCarthy about the matter and that Rep. McCarthy had been using his position to support SASD's proposal."

According to the complaint, a few days later, in his Sept. 9, 2019, testimony before the House Committee on Veterans Affairs, McCarthy spoke in favor of SASD's proposal and against Progress for Bakersfield Veterans LLC, the owners of the old clinic, who have proposed to renovate the existing VA clinic.

"Rep. McCarthy claimed that because of the delays in the award process, the VA had doubled the lease payments made to the current facility owner to $2 million per month," the complaint states.

McCarthy's remarks were inaccurate, The Californian reported in October. At the time of his comments, the VA was paying the clinic $172,178 per month.

"While a spokeswoman for Rep. McCarthy acknowledged the inaccuracy in regards to the lease cost, and said the Republican Leader would correct his congressional testimony, he does not appear to have done so," the complaint continues. "In fact, a video of Rep. McCarthy’s inaccurate testimony as well as transcript of his statement with the false claims remain posted on his official congressional website."

According to McCarthy's office, formal protests have delayed the process, but the VA has also made mistakes throughout its own lease award process.

"The VA actually provided the congressman's office with the $2 million monthly figures that he referenced in his committee testimony," his office said via email. "The VA's mistakes throughout the 2018 lease award process have allowed protestors to prevail, and the congressman is hopeful that now the VA will accurately follow its own timeline and execute its procurement process correctly so that a lease award can be announced and Bakersfield veterans have the new clinic facility that they are expecting."

Veterans in Kern County have been waiting more than a decade since Congress authorized the development of a new clinic. Instead the process has languished.

In 2018, in what seemed like a breakthrough, McCarthy announced at a local news conference that a lease had been awarded by the VA to San Diego-based SASD to construct a $40 million facility near Olive and Knudsen drives.

The long-awaited clinic was slated to replace the aging facility on Westwind Drive. But one year after the announcement, no visible work had begun at the development site.

Progress for Bakersfield Veterans LLC, the owners of the old clinic, had filed a protest, making it impossible for VA to move forward, VA spokesman Damian McGee told The Californian last fall. The VA terminated the lease award to SASD last year.

McCarthy's office said the VA failed to follow its own process in the initial lease award, and said McCarthy spoke with the VA secretary about the situation "because it was important that they be held accountable."

"If this entire series of events shows us anything, it is that the VA contracting process is broken," McCarthy's office said. "It was the VA’s incompetence and subsequent protests on the new award that are delaying a necessary new VA clinic." The congressman's office called the missteps and delays "a disservice to veterans in the community."

Allen Hubsch, a partner with Progress for Bakersfield Veterans, said in October they protested the award to SASD because the VA admitted PBV didn't receive a fair shake in the clinic selection process.

The VA admitted to watchdog agencies that it failed to properly evaluate Progress for Bakersfield Veterans' offer to renovate the existing facility, Hubsch said. After that, it was determined that VA had wrongfully awarded the bid to SASD.

"We have been offering a complete renovation of the existing clinic to VA for more than 10 years now, from top to bottom, with a modern, efficient layout and all the latest technology and equipment," he said. "A renovation could be done in a fraction of the time and at a fraction of the cost."

Reached Thursday, Hubsch declined to comment on the complaint sent this week to the VA's inspector general. But he did comment on the VA's performance.

"From what I can tell, VA doesn't understand Bakersfield," Hubsch said. "Bakersfield veterans don't want or deserve a smaller clinic, and the existing clinic is in a much better location than where VA wants to move it."

Steven Mayer can be reached at 661-395-7353. Follow him on Facebook and on Twitter: @semayerTBC.

Recommended for you

(15) comments

Masked 2020

Really Zippy...Activist Facts....and your buying what their selling?........ About Us

This site, created by the Center for Organizational Research and Education (CORE), is committed to providing detailed and up-to-date information about organizations and activists. We have analyzed scores of media clippings, official statements, and government documents to create this database.

The organizations we track on this site are tax-exempt nonprofits, many of which engage in anti-consumer activism. Many are linked by personnel, history, and finances. These groups promote false science, scare campaigns, and sometimes even violent “direct actions” to threaten our right to choose certain products.

Some have gone far beyond their founding principles in their anti-consumer agendas. Others use misleading names to hide their radical agendas and engage in hypocritical and deceptive practices. Many over-inflate public health causes to enact punitive taxes and bans on our favorite foods and beverages. These activists trade on undeserved good names to attack our consumer choices.

This site is dedicated to showing the true faces of these radical organizations. For instance, did you know:

The Humane Society of the United States doesn’t run a single pet shelter, and despite its advertisements’ reliance on images of distressed dogs and cats gives less than one percent of its $130 million budget to support hands-on care of pets at local pet shelters?

People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) kills the vast majority of pets it takes into its pet shelter each year — in some years upward of 95 percent — according to Virginia state government records?

The Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine (PCRM), another animal liberation group received $432,000 from PETA to falsely promote itself as a mainstream medical charity?

The Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI) advocates banning sodas and scaremongers against dishes that Americans enjoy despite being largely responsible for the adoption of harmful trans fat cooking oil in the first place?

The Environmental Working Group and the president of the Waterkeeper Alliance promoted the harmful myth that childhood vaccines cause autism?

Another big reason activist groups are able to maintain their “good names”: Nobody’s been watching them and providing this level of research. Until now.

We welcome your comments, questions, compliments, and concerns.

Media Contact

Press is asked to call 202-720-7871 or email info@coreprojects.com.

Masked 2020

Veritass .... the Russians already have a puppet on 1600 Pennsylvania Ave Nw, Washington, DC 20500


Wonder how many vets are here on this "blog" . . . (& that "b" stands for "balderdash").

Ask us what we think. Kevin is dealing with mixed bags of COVID and this clinic thing. Give us reasons to move v stay upgrade. Pros and Cons work for us as staff has said "stay". Dunno . . . need facts . . . just the facts, Ma'am . . . !


According to ACTIVIST FACTS site, this organization is one of hundreds which are created to be a lapdog for democrats and anti-Republicans and Trump. It obscures its donors so that the public cannot find who the members, other than it originates out of an office in Wash., DC. It is certainly NOT unbiased, even thought its name sounds good.


It’s probably the Russians. They are helping the Dems because they want Biden to be their puppet.

Floyd Roberts

Being so close to his mentor, lyin Donny, Kevin has stooped to the same level.


The existing clinic has long been acknowledged to be way too small and grossly inadequate. As the Representative for the area, McCarthy has been fulfilling his responsibility to advocate for a more suitable facility. Too bad if the existing facility is owned by a group connected to the other side's political base.


"From what I can tell, VA doesn't understand Bakersfield," Hubsch said. "Bakersfield veterans don't want or deserve a smaller clinic, and the existing clinic is in a much better location than where VA wants to move it."

I'm pretty sure the above sentence is indicating that the proposed new site is smaller than the existing site. Might want to take another look and revise your claim.


The “Guv” has plenty of other corrupt actions and incompetent decisions of his own. www.RecallGavin.com

Masked 2020

Its all Gavin's fault....


"First and foremost, the congressman's ultimate goal is to ensure that our veterans can receive the long-awaited care they rightfully deserve, " for his personal financial gain.

Bam Bam

Can you explain exactly how he would gain financially? Facts please!


[thumbdown] Morondeep, Perhaps you'd be happier in Portland or Seattle. As I've read your comments they reflect the insanity of those regions.

Bam Bam

I’d be happy to buy him a one way ticket.


McCarthy 🐕💨💨💨💨

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.