Things didn’t go as hoped this week for an effort among downtown property owners to spur economic development in the area.

The Downtown Bakersfield Property-based Business Improvement District Committee did not garner enough signatures of support from owners to make the 50 percent-plus-one threshold required by May 15 to move forward with an effort to add an assessment to the county’s property tax roll for next year.

Property owners within the district boundaries would have been assessed and taxed based on size and other factors.

Money raised from the assessments, estimated at $850,000 a year, would have gone toward cleaning and other beautification efforts, adding more security guards, bulking up marketing efforts and more in an effort to help revitalize downtown.

“I’m a little disappointed only because I want our businesses to do better,” said Bob Bell, a member of the committee and a downtown property owner. “I’m anxious to work side by side with my fellow business owners to make this happen. Forming a PBID is so valuable to the strength of downtown.”

The proposed district lines run from F Street east about one mile to Q Street, and from Truxtun Avenue as far north as 30th Street on the west side, and 24th Street on the east.

It would have encompassed and assessed every property within those boundaries, regardless of whether they’re retail, restaurant or governmental properties.

There are 441 owners in the district who hold more than 700 properties within the district boundaries. (Full disclosure: The Bakersfield Californian’s property on Eye Street is included in the district and is listed among the top 25 largest in the district.)

Bell said that rather than being an issue of a widespread lack of support from property owners, the real issue was that the committee just didn’t have enough time to reach out to all the owners and hear back from them all by the May deadline.

Organizers only a few months ago finished developing plans, filing legal documents, drawing up district boundaries and other preliminary steps, Bell said. The committee thought it might be able to get enough signatures from owners in time to make the deadline, but that didn’t pan out.

“We only had a few months after getting everything ready to actually go get the signature. That’s quite the tall task,” Bell said. “We thought it could happen, but now more than ever, our thought is to slow things down and take our time getting the signatures.”

Bell said material was mailed and emailed to all property owners in the proposed district. However, he said many owners have been slow to respond.

“When you get a piece of mail, you might read it, do some research. Some people don’t have a lot of time to respond quickly,” he said. “Everybody deserves the time to read the petition, communicate with us and learn more about it and understand the fullness of the PBID.”

The committee also held various meetings and tried to meet face-to-face with as many owners as possible, but that proved to be a challenge.

“A large percentage don’t live in Kern County anymore, so getting into contact with them is complicated,” he said.

In the end, Bell said they were only able to get responses back from about 40 percent of owners since March.

There is a group of about 25 property owners who are against the PBID effort, in part because they feel the money would go toward services already provided by the city.

“We don’t feel that it’s viable in its present form,” said Adam Cohen, who speaks for the group.

The committee isn’t giving up on the PBID effort. It plans to try again for the 2020 county tax roll.

If the committee is able to reach or surpass the required threshold, the proposal would then go to the City Council for certification. If approved, an election would be held among property owners. 

Andrae Gonzales, councilman for the downtown area, said he's hopeful the effort will be successful. 

"There are still good conversations happening about the direction of downtown," he said. "We're seeing a lot of movement right now in property owners investing in their own properties. I think it's all heading in the right direction."

Bell said he believes the PBID is crucial to the overall vitality of downtown Bakersfield because it can go further than the city can in investing in the area.

“We want Bakersfield to be one of the best cities in America, and it’s not going to be that way if we just rely on the government to grow,” Bell said. "I don’t think it’s just the city’s responsibility to make our downtown better. I think it’s something (property owners) need to take some self-responsibility for.”

Bell said he also believes there’s a lot of power in property owners working together not just to help their own businesses but each other as well.

“Instead of just going it alone, I would much rather pool my resources and my efforts with my property owner buddies and help them as I help myself,” he said. “The point is that property owners need to be collaborating and having consensus. It’s about the future of downtown, not just any one business.”

Joseph Luiz can be reached at 395-7368 or by email at You can also follow him on Twitter @JLuiz_TBC. 

(5) comments


The homeless/panhandler issue downtown is huge and it appears the City has no intentions to combat it. I feel bad for downtown business owners who deal with it daily. To give an example, I recently visited a downtown restaurant for dinner. While walking to the restaurant after parking my car, I was approached and asked for money by a panhandler. Then across the street a man was urinating on the side of a building, which is not an uncommon site downtown. We get into the restaurant and are seated. Next thing I know, the restaurant staff is chasing another homeless man out of the women's restroom while the hostess is on the phone with BPD trying to get a police officer to respond. The homeless man had entered the restaurant and followed a female employee to the women's restroom and refused to leave. Once the staff got him out of the restaurant, he stood at the front entrance yelling and screaming. He refused to move from the doorway. The hostess was still on the phone with BPD, which by this point 10 minutes had gone by and no officer had shown. Finally, with the help of a few male customers, the man was finally convinced to walk away from the restaurant and continued yelling down the street. We continued with our meal, no police ever showed. Going to dinner downtown can be a hassle, it needs to be cleaned up.


I guess it isn't enough that all these businesses pay taxes, sales, licenses, alarm permits property tax etc and can't get the city to clean up downtown its a pig stye, urine soaked alley's feces on the sidewalks, homeless sleeping in every nook and cranny... Where are the PD ? they used to walk and bicycle the beat downtown now I only see them driving through it... ignoring everything they see, the same homeless people in the same place everyday or the panhandlers... Same ones everyday hitting you up for money... I would imagine if they were in the South West "Something could be done" ....


Our growing group of property owners is opposed to this effort. 18% overhead off the top ... very inefficient way of managing resources. We can provide individual services less expensive than pooling resources together with nearly 1 in 5 dollars taken off the top. Very disappointed in our local DBA/DBDC.


OMG . . . Seattle revisited . . . except . . . whoa, this is biz-based self-taxation? Don't get it. If cleanup is the goal, how 'bout biz-coalition garnering $$ and doing it without that wonderful thing called "ENFORCED ASSESSMENT" . . . ! C'Mon guys, doityourself . . .! Oh, and BTW, what's the prob stem from anyway . . . ? Oh yeah, malls, "big-box stores", 'Walmart Syndrome' (ship to home--internet). Get real and look outside that "little box store" you live inside of that is 'arcane', not 'arcade' . . .! And . . . AND! . . . don't forget the 'Three P's'-- "PARKING, PRICING & PACKAGING" . . .!


Why is the article all about Bob Bell?

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.