Every time Eileen and Mireya Rodriguez-Del Rio are back in the news, things get chaotic.

It happened last week when the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing's discrimination case against Tastries Bakery had a court hearing, the first in a series of legal clashes over the bakery’s decision not to make the Rodiguez-Del Rios wedding cake.

Facebook posts. Stares. Questions at work.

Why not just go somewhere else for a cake? Are they just trying to cash in with the lawsuit? Is this just a plan to close down a good Christian business?

When the news broke last week, and the media wrote about the legal setback, they opted not to respond immediately to requests for comment.

They try to stay off social media. They watch their back in the mall. And they support each other.

“We’re not sure if anyone is going to lash out at us,” Eileen said.


Fair Employment and Housing lawyers asked Kern County Superior Court Judge David Lampe last week to issue a temporary restraining order that would require Tastries owner Cathy Miller to make wedding cakes for same-sex couples, or not make wedding cakes at all.

Lampe ruled against the request, and denied the restraining order.

But the issue is scheduled to return to court on Feb. 2 for a hearing on a preliminary injunction – a more robust discussion of whether the bakery should be required to make cakes for couples like Mrs. and Mrs. Rodriguez-Del Rio while the full trial proceeds through court.

Under the California Unruh Civil Rights Act law a business that offers service to the public cannot deny service to a customer based on factors such as race, gender, religion or sexual orientation.

But Miller claimed, back when the issue exploded into the news in August, that she was following the tenants of her faith and conscience by refusing to participate in a ceremony she believes is morally wrong.

Miller is being defended by the Freedom of Conscience Defense Fund, which issued a statement last week calling the lawsuit an assault on Christians and their beliefs.


The Rodriguez-Del Rio family is not sorry, they said, that they vented on Facebook in August that they’d been denied a cake by Tastries for their Oct. 7 wedding celebration.

It was that post that triggered the heated debate and led eventually to the two women filing a complaint with the Department of Fair Employment and housing.

But they say they’re paying a price for having their names and pictures out there.

Eileen Rodriguez-Del Rio said she has been stared at in the mall and the post office, an unsettling experience.

Those looks, and Kern County’s conservative bent, make them worry about their safety.

And comments on social media, Eileen said, “They’re just very ugly.”

She’s rarely on Facebook any more.

People are calling their motives into question, assuming they’re doing this for money or to piggy-back on the upcoming U.S. Supreme Court decision in a similar case out of Colorado.

Eileen said she didn’t even know about the Colorado case when she posted her frustration and was hurt about the Tastries situation on Facebook.

The two women’s attorney, Patricia Ziegler-Lopez, said there are financial penalties if the Department of Fair Employment and Housing wins its case.

But Eileen and Mireya say that’s not why they’re going through with the complaint.

“We’re doing it because we were discriminated against and it’s not right and it’s not fair,” Eileen said. “It’s not about the money. It’s wasn’t about the cake. It was that our rights were violated."

So, when their case goes back to court in early February, they’ll deal with the negative Facebook posts, the stares in the mall and the worry that someone might be mad enough to strike out against them.


One of the biggest criticisms of the Rodriguez-Del Rios dispute was that they were already married when they walked into Tastries to talk about a cake.

“Last August, two LGBT activists entered Tastries purportedly wanting a wedding cake, even though they had gotten married the previous December,” reads the press release from Miller’s law firm.

The two women had indeed married in a ceremony several months earlier.

“All we had was a commitment ceremony with our moms and our families,” Eileen said. “We planned a celebratory wedding. Every bride should have their dream wedding.”

James Burger can be reached at 661‑395-7415. Follow him on Twitter: @KernQuirks.

(7) comments


To Eileen and Mireya, I hope you two have a wonderful life. It is awful to be going through this, but just know it will be important for the future of your fellow brothers and sisters. I know the deep pain of discrimination, and non acceptance,and so does the State of California, you also have the support of so many brothers and sisters.
A wedding is one of the deepest forms of conveying love ,who can put that assunder?


I am from england and very grateful because it's already fully writing articles so what I know is easy because of this blog. Thank you.


Eileen said. “It’s not about the money. If that is true, then don't ask for money. Ask for one dollar to prove your point and then donate the dollar to a charity to prove that it is not about the money. My guess..your actions will tell us how honest that comment was. Next.


Your very words are exactly why discrimination against others are protected by the state of California.


I think most of us feel this way. If you want to marry the same sex as yourself, please do. Please though don't go around and target small businesses that are allowed to have their own values. If someone isn't able to make you happy go find a competitor who can make you happy. I'm pretty sure there is no constitutional right to make a cook fix food for you because you may want it so. I would imagine from what I've read that if a KKK member came into this bakery she wouldn't fix them a cake with a burning cross on it.
Please do us all a favor, quit wasting court time over such a trivial thing.


How do you relate a wedding to the KKK? Was your wedding a trivial thing. .?
Weddings between two people no matter who they are generate love,and express blessings that are passed unto each of us.


The REAL question is: Why is the Californian giving so much ink and paper to these publicity seekers? Your role as the "useful idiot" continues....

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.