Valley Fever Lab

A microbiologist performs immunodiffusion valley fever tests in the Kern County Public Health laboratory. 

Rob Purdie is an upbeat guy. You can hear it in his unfailingly positive statements, his voice tinged with a Central Valley twang from a life spent in Bakersfield.

You wouldn’t guess this is a man with a reservoir surgically built into the top of his skull, and that he spends one full day a month with antifungal drugs pumping directly into his brain.

Purdie has Valley fever, or coccidioidomycosis, a disease he caught in 2012 that’s caused by an airborne soil fungus. In his case, the fungus gave him meningitis, a swelling of the membranes that line the brain and spinal cord. The pain in his head has been intense, and the monthly drug injections are even more excruciating, he said.

“It sounds horrible, and it is,” Purdie said. But “lucky for me, valley fever meningitis can be treated.”

The number of reported valley fever cases set a record in California in 2016, with more than 6,000 infections. That number jumped to 8,103 in 2017, an increase of more than a third — growth many experts link to climate change. This year could be the worst yet.

Valley fever season starts this month. Most cases surface between September and November, but through August this year more than 5,000 cases were reported in California, putting the state on pace for a new record.

“We’re seeing a huge increase in new cases in the past two-and-a-half years. It’s striking,” said Ian McHardy, co-director of the Center for Valley Fever at the University of California, Davis. “We’re seeing double and triple the cases. It’s a catastrophic change, and it’s getting worse.”

The fungus typically infects the lungs after spores are inhaled (it is not contracted person-to-person), producing a persistent cough and chest pain or other flu-like symptoms that can require months of treatment. In some cases — like Purdie’s — it can spread. It can be hard to diagnose because it can mimic other ailments, and in many people symptoms fade away on their own.

Gov. Jerry Brown this month signed three bills into law to help combat valley fever. The current state budget includes $8 million for research and education, to keep more Californians from catching the infection and to foster better diagnoses so symptoms can be treated accurately.

But despite the state response, experts say the disease likely will continue to expand, with more people getting it in more areas of the state.

One big reason, McHardy said, is climate change. A growing number of dust storms in California have spread the fungal spores far beyond the Central valley, where the infections traditionally have been concentrated.

“We know there’s a direct correlation between these dust storms and valley fever, and we know climate change is increasing the extreme weather patterns here, including the dust storms,” he said.

Valley fever is no longer strictly a Valley phenomenon. It has spread north to Sacramento and west all the way to the coast.

“(In places) like Monterey, Los Angeles and San Luis Obispo counties, where we don’t expect to find it, it’s becoming much more common,” McHardy said.

Democratic Assemblyman Rudy Salas Jr. of Hanford wrote the three valley fever bills the governor signed. He said the infection has been reported in 53 of California’s 58 counties, and he has family members and friends who have contracted it.

The state’s health care costs have spiraled higher with the increase in infections, he said. “The costs to our health care system … were around $2 billion” in a 10-year period ending in 2011, Salas said, citing the most recent state cost study. “And we have only seen an increase in cases since then.”

The $8 million is “the largest allocation in our state’s history specifically targeting valley fever,” he said. About $3 million of it will go toward expansion of the valley Fever Center in Kern County and its research on why some people who inhale the fungus get sick and others don’t.

Because valley fever can resemble the flu, many physicians outside of the Central Valley don’t consider it in their diagnoses, even though the blood test to identify it is inexpensive and simple.

The federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimated there are about 150,000 undiagnosed cases a year, and McHardy said he thinks the number is higher.

The most dangerous manifestation is meningitis, he said — “and by the time they go to the hospital it’s too late, and I think a lot of people die from it without ever being diagnosed,” McHardy said.

The California Department of Public Health doesn’t regularly track deaths from valley fever but did compile statistics in one study. Officials concluded that 1,098 people died of the disease in California from 2000 to 2013, averaging about 73 deaths a year statewide.

The downside is obvious and can be terrifying, Purdie said. But he circled back to the bright side, saying that educating both patients and physicians to better recognize the infection could make a huge difference. Once people figure out they have valley fever, especially in the earlier stages of the infection, he noted, it’s treatable.

And “fortunately,” he added, “most people won’t get it as severely as I did.”

CALmatters is a nonprofit, nonpartisan media venture explaining California’s policies and politics.

(4) comments


Mean sea level rise has remained between 2-3mm annually for the last 200 years, which obviously has zero correlation with CO2.

For the math deficient among us, that would be 8-12 inches per century as opposed to the obsurd and desperate claims we hear from the alarmists.

Move on and find something else to worry about.


"Valley Fever? Manhattan will be underwater by 2015 if we don't all live in huts immediately!"


Climate change is a myth. We all know this, deep down. Some of you reading this may have been taken in by the fear-mongering governments or corrupt scientists so have been brainwashed into thinking climate change is a real thing that “threatens all of humanity” or some other nonsense, but it’s just that: nonsense. When you look closely at it, the so-called evidence for climate change, or “global warming” or “warmageddon” or “planetary death spiral” or whatever they’re calling it these days, it doesn’t stand up to scrutiny.

Take changes in sea level. They keep banging on about how the warming of the atmosphere causes rising sea levels, but if that was happening we’d have seen it by now! It’s been countless decades since they first started predicting this, but here we still are! But they persist in trying to convince us it’s a real threat, citing places that were supposedly “lost to the waves” and we’re supposed to believe that places like Atlantis, Miami or Skegness actually existed? You believe that rubbish and you probably believe we landed on Ganymede! And you’re an idiot, so there’s no hope for you.


This is the stupidest comment I've ever read on this site. It is demonstrably true that sea levels are rising. And they're rising because the Earth is warming up. And the Earth is warming up in part because that's what it does over time. But, also because we're putting a blanket of chemicals over the Earth that warms it up (even Reagan acknowledged this. He signed the Montreal Protocol).

What's the harm is admitting that the human lifestyle causes some damage? Why does that enrage you - and Churchillis1, apparently - so much? I don't see this as a political issue at all.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.