A controversial proposal to build five-story dorms at Coffee Road and Stockdale Highway was rejected Tuesday by a unanimous vote of Bakersfield's Board of Zoning Adjustment.

The project's Monterey-based developer, who expressed surprise at the opposition the project elicited among neighbors, said he was undecided whether to appeal the board's decision to the City Council.

"We're going to get together and talk about it," said David Moon, president of Coleraine Capital Group Inc. "So, I don't know" whether an appeal would be filed, he added.

Tuesday's 3-0 vote followed a staff recommendation that the 660-bed project be turned down based on findings that student housing at nearby Cal State Bakersfield is less than 70 percent occupied and that far more surrounding residents spoke out against the project than voiced support for it.

Project opponents packed a more than two-hour hearing at City Hall South, where many criticized the project as inappropriate for its proposed location. They said it would drive additional traffic through their quiet neighborhoods, present new dangers to pedestrian travel through the area and compromise their privacy.

Stockdale Estates resident Richard Armstrong said after the vote he was pleased by the board's decision to follow its staff's advice.

"People don't want to live next to a five-story apartment building," he said.

Coleraine, which has built successful dormitories at other California State University campuses, had applied for a conditional use permit because the property is zoned for commercial and offices uses, not residential. Its Bakersfield project was to include a swimming pool, Internet cafe and multimedia rooms, while offering shuttle service, security and student activity programming.

Before the afternoon hearing, the city received 12 letters of support for the project and 90 against it, plus hundreds of signatures of people opposed to the development.

Only one person unaffiliated with Coleraine spoke in favor of the project during Tuesday's meeting. Linda Morales, a parent of college students, said she liked the idea of in-fill housing near the university. She also said she didn't want Moon to think all Bakersfield residents were "Nimbys," an acronym for "not in my back yard."

The university came out strongly against the proposal. Spokeswoman Jen Self spoke during the hearing's rebuttal period, saying even though Coleraine gained community support for its dorm projects in Monterey and San Jose, Bakersfield "is not Monterey or San Jose."

Addressing Moon's contention his project would cost students half what CSUB charges, Self asserted the university is looking to reduce the cost of its dorm housing.

City Councilman Andrae Gonzales attended the hearing but did not speak publicly. When asked, he declined to share his opinion of the project, saying he needs to remain neutral in case Coleraine appeals to the council.

John Cox can be reached at 661-395-7404. Follow him on Twitter: @TheThirdGraf. Sign up at Bakersfield.com for free newsletters about local business.

(6) comments

LittleChicksLipsense

Why does the article state "dorms"? In the report from the city it states (and Mr. Moon has said) it's no longer student housing. That happened before the city planning recommended the conditional use permit be denied. The project is not affiliated with an educational institution and therefore can't discriminate/distinguish between who can and can't rent.

REMUDA

Good. Also, perhaps some of the 'neighbors' have 'room and board' extra bedrooms that some students prefer . . . and at more convenience, privacy and lower cost than 'dorms'.

LittleChicksLipsense

the condos and apartments that already surround the area aren't at capacity (the on campus housing is also at only 64% capacity)

Patricia Edna

Thank you city leaders!

2carpoor

Thank you's to all who participated in this exciting exchange of views. No cussing, no finger pointing and lots of patient listening to all sides. Shows it can be done. The process worked.

Django

Here are the most recent numbers on CSUB enrollment. Latino families represent a majority. 60+ % of enrollees are female as well. It’s cheaper to live at home and go st school than work full or part time, rent an apartment or stay in the dorms. The CSUB dorms are undersubscribed. Building off campus housing makes no sense at all.

58% Hispanic or Latino
17% White/Caucasian
7% Asian
6% Black/African-American or Black
5% Non-Resident Alien
3% Two or More Races
3% Unknown Race/Ethnicity
1% Native American

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.