2127194655-data.jpg-3

The Trail of 100 Giants in Sequoia National Forest features some of the largest trees in the world.

A massive tree die-off in both the Sierra and Sequoia national forests have caused officials to revise a plan meant to save the parks as climate conditions have worsened.

Across the state, about 147 million trees lie standing dead, according to a report by the U.S. Forest Service, with about 1.4 million acres of the destruction concentrated in both national forests.

A drought starting in 2011, combined with mismanagement of the forests by the Forest Service, left trees vulnerable to intense fire hazards and bark beetle infestations, the report said.

Around 2015, “the Sequoia and Sierra National forests began seeing die-offs at an alarming rate,” the report said. “Scientists are monitoring the massive tree die-off in the Sierra Nevada and warn that climate change impacts over the next decade will increase the threat of ongoing mortality in the region.”

The Forest Service is in the process of devising two plans meant to restore the parks to healthy ecosystems. Its current management plan was last updated in 1990, and park officials consider it to be out of date.

Among other flaws, the agency’s policy of suppressing fires within the parks allowed both Sequoia and Sierra forests to become too overgrown, which increased the risk of catastrophic wildfires and beetle infestations, according to the Forest Service’s own report.

The policy, which was in place for around 30 years, threatened the entire ecosystem.

Any updates to the management plan would seek to restore the forest to the condition they were in before the Forest Service allowed them to become overgrown, either through “mechanical trimming” or prescribed burning.

Many communities in Kern County rely on Sequoia National Forest for water, recreation and tourism. Changes to the management of the system could alter the types of activities that are allowed in certain areas.

The Forest Service initially completed draft plans in 2016, but increased tree mortality forced the agency to revise the plan.

It is now taking public comment on the revision to the original plan, which addresses substantial tree deaths that have occurred over the last three years.

Environmental groups have criticized the new plans, saying both the Sequoia and Sierra plans exposes too much of the forests’ wilderness areas to logging operations and are not tied to specific budget amounts.

“The agency has suffered budget cuts almost every year for the last several years,” said Steve Evans, Wild Rivers Director for the California Wilderness Coalition. “The problem of not tying a plan to a budget is that they’re not telling the local members of congress how much money they need.”

For its part, the Forest Service admits that it does not have enough money to complete the forest restoration, and needs to rely on certain logging operations within the park in order to underwrite other rehabilitation efforts.

Without the logging, those efforts would be hampered, the agency wrote in its report.

The agency has scheduled a public workshop for Bakersfield in late August to take input. It hopes to develop the final plan by 2020 for implementation in the near future.

You can reach Sam Morgen at 661-395-7415. You may also follow him on Twitter @smorgenTBC.

(2) comments

JSmith

Well tree huggers what do you want? Continued policy that prevents the use of federal lands, managed logging and let the forests died slowly. It has worked so well, millions of trees dead and massive forest fires. Let's try something less emotional and reasonable like removing some of this fire fuel and make money at the same time.

yorkies2014

you mean these folks are guarding the hen house?.......DENVER, June 19 (UPI) -- U.S. environmental groups are sounding the alarm that one of the oldest environmental laws in the United States is being weakened on multiple fronts by the Trump administration. The U.S. Forest Service last week proposed changes to the agency's participation in the National Environmental Policy Act that could potentially fast-track logging, oil and gas exploration and grazing in U.S. forests. This week, an environmental group sued the Environmental Protection Agency for withholding information on how the agency abolished an oversight grading system used with the act. The forest service announced in the Federal Register that it would overhaul how it analyzes the environmental impacts of projects on its 193 million acres of national forest land.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.