There's been a major development in the murder case of Bakersfield businessman Jose Arredondo. And I mean major. Defense attorneys for Roberto Gonzalez, the man charged with Arredondo's murder, successfully argued at a recent court hearing that key evidence obtained by police in Cabo San Lucas was gathered either through illegal or improper means. At the end of the three-day hearing, Judge Adrian Rios Ordaz agreed. He threw out all the state evidence, which means prosecutors are essentially left without a case. And Gonzalez, the only suspect arrested in Arredondo's murder, may walk out of jail a free man.

"(Prosecutors) have zero credibility in Roberto's participation in the case," jubilant defense attorney Jaime Tacher said in an interview from Mexico.

Tacher and fellow lawyer Julio Cesar Garcia de Leon challenged the evidence in a very meticulous manner, ripping away at how and why the evidence was invalid. Arredondo was found dead in his condo in Cabo San Lucas the morning of July 16, 2019. It was a most brutal murder, his right ear had been mutilated, a fingernail was pulled from its nail bed, he was stabbed in the back numerous times and beaten to death. Police interviewed several times the security guard on duty the previous night. According to the court record, Diego Magallan told police he saw and identified Gonzalez drive into the Gardenias condo complex, park his vehicle and walk into Arredondo's unit the night of July 15. Arredondo's body was found the next morning.

Tacher tracked down Magallan and his father. Turns out Magallan was 17 years old at the time when questioned by police, something never disclosed by police. Under Mexican law, police cannot question a minor without a parent, guardian or psychologist present. Police failed to mention no such person was present when the young security guard was questioned, nor did prosecutors deny this.

Further, Magallan would later testify that he never told police what they claim he had said, and said he signed whatever documents police placed in front of him because he was scared. Magallan testified he was held against his will, beaten and intimidated by agents of the State Attorney General's Office and forced to sign papers. Judge Rios Ordaz threw out the statements allegedly made by Magallan, including identifying Gonzalez as the man entering Arredondo's condo that night.

"All that evidence is null and void," said Tacher.

The defense then zeroed in on how police said to have found Gonzalez's Chevy Suburban on a city street. Investigators did not then and there follow proper procedure in securing evidence, said the defense. Police failed to inventory, photograph evidence inside the vehicle or restrict access to it before it was hauled off to an impound lot. Prosecutors said blood stains were found on the pedals, carpet and on a pair of golf shoes belonging to Gonzalez that were in the vehicle. The blood was a match to the murder victim. After analyzing police reports, the judge sided with the defense, agreeing there had been a serious breach in following the chain of custody and processing the vehicle.

"What was found in said vehicle and everything in there at hand as a consequence is null," said the judge. He threw this evidence out as well.

The defense claims police planted the blood stains and the golf shoes in the vehicle to frame their client. In the one year since Arredondo's death, the case has taken bizarre twists. Gonzalez claims that after being interviewed by police shortly after Arredondo's death, he was kidnapped, tortured and his life threatened by agents of the State Attorney General's Office who tried to make him confess as the murderer. Others unrelated to Gonzalez have testified they too were kidnapped and tortured by agents in an attempt to implicate Gonzalez as the murderer.

The one thing both sides agree on is that Gonzalez is a long-time friend and golfing partner of Jose Arredondo and that Gonzalez was the last person to have been with him the night of July 15 when they had dinner at Arredondo's condo. So why arrest Gonzalez?

"I believe there is a hidden agenda here," said Tacher. "They are covering up for someone. It's impossible that after one year and two months ... they have not investigated anybody else."

I contacted the State Attorney General's Office for comment on the judge's ruling, but so far nada. It must now decide whether to go forward with the case or release Gonzalez. The next hearing is scheduled for Sept. 21 in Cabo San Lucas. Defense lawyers say they feel "90 percent" certain Gonzalez will walk out a free man.

Contributing columnist Jose Gaspar is a news anchor/reporter for Telemundo Bakersfield and KGET. Email him at elcompa29@gmail.com. The views expressed here are his own.

Recommended for you

(9) comments

Masked 2020

So the corrupt police gave the corrupt prosecutor bad evidence? That allowed the corrupt defense attorney to argue the case before the corrupt judge and get the case dismissed....sounds like Trumps America... you just left out UncleBarr

WearAMask

This was in Mexico, genius.

Masked 2020

dah.....I have a globe

All Star

So the corrupt police gave the corrupt prosecutor bad evidence? That allowed the corrupt defense attorney to argue the case before the corrupt judge and get the case dismissed.

RubySue

There were always so many rumors circulating around Arredondo, from drug trafficking to his sexuality. I'm not surprised he came to this end. When a very handsome local real estate agent was found dead in the Kern River, rumors flew about who could have been responsible for that death. When Arredondo's best friend was fingered for his death, it seemed all too fast. I'm not surprised it was a cover up by Mexican police.

Mrknowitall

What a sick racist comment. Just because nobody is interested in your ugly self... You are not surprised he came to this dnd?

So sick. Are you certain you are not inbred? I’ll pay ancestry.com to run your bloodlines. Not confident you pass muster

Gene Pool Chlorinator

What racist about that? When leftist loons like you run out of "facts", you always fall back to "RACIST!!!".

There were rumors of both of the things she mentioned- I'm not saying I believe any were true, but they were there.

Maybe if you possessed a quarter of the intellect you claim, it would be bright as the sun. Instead, you go back to the tired and true Leftist response when you realize you've lost the argument.

I'm sorry you were a failure in your parent's eyes, but continuing the most non-believable ruse in the history of TBC won't change your past.

Now, YOU go get me a Bulgogi meatloaf Loco Moco, some Dim Sum and a Sapporo Extra Dry. And don't forget my Prada sneakers...

Mrknowitall

Cesspool! I do not run in gay-whisper circles, so you likely have superior gossip you are quick to spew. Perhaps you were spurned by the fairer persuasion and you took the road less traveled. I judge you not. To each his own.

Scarlet necks in Bako were soooo jealous of Jose’s successes—THEZy Auto-default to baseless rumors. THAT behavior—not mine—got them branded as racists. No partisan fog you love to wrap yer sick self in. Nay. Not I.

I’m a well-known community figure with many noble accomplishments. That much is obvious, even to a remnants of a sordid regurgitation such as yourself.

Yes. Parents. You lash out as an orphan or as one neglected. I pity you.

My many followers here marvel at the clarity and truths I provide—free of charge. ‘Tis my duty don’t you know. My status as an all-time great of TBC is a given. Bow down and acknowledge your master, son. It’s ok to admire me as you secretly do.

When you can match wits with your Daddy. THEN you may perhaps be allowed tonorder a few kernels of popcorn. Until then.,, fetch me a Chile Verde taco and a side order of red rice and beans. Add me s pint of RC Cola and a box of Good & Plenty. Pink and white. And you BEST not forget my house shoes, Fool!

Gene Pool Chlorinator

@MrKnowNothingAtAll:

Sorry to disappoint you, but if it makes you feel better, you can refer to me as a lesbian trapped in a man's body...

You aren't a well-known community figure, nor are you MIT educated, and you haven't darkened the path of anything resembling a law school- an occasional tryst with the law doesn't count.

I seek not to match wits with you as my father (one half of my wonderful parents who are extremely proud of me and my accomplishments in this world) always told me to show pity and not engage in a battle of wits with an unarmed opponent.

Continue to enjoy your fictional online persona- you aren't hurting anybody and the Libertarian in me says that although I fervently disagree with much of what you write, and call 95% BS in your life experience claims, you do you. Whatever helps you to sleep at might amigo...

Adios...

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.