Opinion

Saturday, Feb 04 2012 09:54 PM

Paying public employees

As a corollary to Marc Haiungs' Jan. 31 Community Voices piece "Don't balance budgets at expense of public servants' pensions," let me say in general the public gets its money's worth from public employees. I spent the last half of my career in the County Counsel's office, taking a pay cut of more than 60 percent when I left private practice. True, I was motivated by a desire for more family and church-work time, but what made it practical and possible was the retirement and fringe benefits. While with the County Counsel's office, I know I saved the county a minimum of $50 million in liability losses by vigorous defense in court, and loss prevention training of county employees.

I was not an exception. The majority of people with whom I worked were highly dedicated and effective. Indeed, I found county employees, on the whole, more efficient and productive than what I saw in the private sector providing legal services to major corporations and businesses. If we want competent public employees, we need to offer an attractive package of pay and benefits. Traditionally, and for me, that meant less pay during my career in exchange for good health insurance and a secure, and not excessive, retirement income.

Bob Woods

Kernville

My Yahoo Print

Advertisement

Hot Topics: Popular stories from The Californian's Opinion section

Most commented stories from the opinion sections

  1. Would tobacco tax money go out of state? (4)

    Both sides of the Proposition 29 debate are making a big deal about whether or not the cancer research that would be funded by the proposed tobacco tax will go exclusively to California labs or be distributed, in part, to research centers elsewhere.

  2. In Bakersfield, a piece of the past slips away (3)
  3. UFW must refocus its efforts on helping farmworkers (1)
  4. Vote yes on housekeeping measures D, E, F