Opinion

Tuesday, Nov 03 2009 10:10 PM

Appeasement danger

The difference between diplomacy and appeasement can be a fine line when dealing with potential enemy nations or terrorists.

The British learned the hard way when, on Sept. 30, 1938, Britain's Prime Minister, Neville Chamberlain, bowing to Adolf Hitler's deception, had departed with a mutual smile and a handshake -- and a signed agreement, allowing Germany certain concessions but not war with Britain. The British public was already feeling the distant drumbeat of another war. They sighed with relief and roared with approval at the news -- but not for long.

Soon thereafter, the Nazis marched across parts of Europe with little resistance. Then German bombs fell over London. But, as Hitler had feared, the British fought back (the rest is history.)

Winston Churchill described the folly of appeasement as "feeding the crocodile in the hope you'll be the last one eaten."

J.B. SELVIDGE

Buttonwillow

My Yahoo Print

Advertisement

Hot Topics: Popular stories from The Californian's Opinion section

Most commented stories from the opinion sections

  1. Would tobacco tax money go out of state? (4)

    Both sides of the Proposition 29 debate are making a big deal about whether or not the cancer research that would be funded by the proposed tobacco tax will go exclusively to California labs or be distributed, in part, to research centers elsewhere.

  2. In Bakersfield, a piece of the past slips away (3)
  3. UFW must refocus its efforts on helping farmworkers (1)
  4. Vote yes on housekeeping measures D, E, F