Opinion

Saturday, Jun 04 2011 11:03 PM

Defib bill fails, but moms aren't quitting the fight

Senate Bill 63's progress came to a halt May 26. This bill would have required all California high schools to have at least one automated external defibrillator (AED) on campus. Freshman students at USC who had a friend saved by an AED researched statistics about sudden cardiac arrest among younger people and got this effort started.

SB 63 was introduced on April 6. That day, I had the honor of meeting these students. Several parents and I traveled to Sacramento and testified before the state senate's education committee. We all shared our own personal stories about our children who died from sudden cardiac arrest.

The bill passed both the education and health committees, but it failed to make it out of the Appropriations Committee. This was a huge disappointment for those of us who understand the importance of saving lives with AEDs in schools. It is estimated that we have lost more than 50 young lives in the past two years in California alone. The ages range from 10 to 23.

Every three days we are losing a young life in the U.S. to sudden cardiac arrest, yet it's an uphill battle to get AEDs placed in our California schools. It's OK to have AEDs in our state buildings, health clubs and casinos but we can't get them into our schools.

For all of us moms who have lost children to sudden cardiac arrest, the fate of SB 63 is heartbreaking. We will regroup and continue to fight this battle.

CORINNE RUIZ

Bakersfield

My Yahoo Print

Advertisement

Hot Topics: Popular stories from The Californian's Opinion section

Most commented stories from the opinion sections

  1. Would tobacco tax money go out of state? (4)

    Both sides of the Proposition 29 debate are making a big deal about whether or not the cancer research that would be funded by the proposed tobacco tax will go exclusively to California labs or be distributed, in part, to research centers elsewhere.

  2. In Bakersfield, a piece of the past slips away (3)
  3. UFW must refocus its efforts on helping farmworkers (1)
  4. Vote yes on housekeeping measures D, E, F