Letters to the Editor

RSS Feed   Print Story   E-mail Story      Add to My Yahoo!   

Food police at it again

| Tuesday, May 13 2008 10:05 PM

Last Updated: Tuesday, May 13 2008 10:08 PM

A report about obesity policy released this week by the California Center for Public Health Advocacy dismisses health measures that focus on personal responsibility or exercise ("Study: Kern No. 3 for fast-food, convenience stores," April 29). Boiled down, the group's message reads: "Americans simply can't be trusted with the complex task of feeding themselves."

BAKERSFIELD.COM HOT TOPICS:

Advertisement

While this kind of rhetoric seems outrageous to most of us, it's becoming increasingly common among activist groups like CCPHA. The "policy recommendations" section of its report included almost a half-dozen new regulations, including fast-food zoning restrictions and menu-labeling mandates. These are consistent with other measures that aim to give bureaucrats control of everything we eat. Think about recent lawsuits against parents of obese children, "sin" taxes on tasty foods and Girl Scout cookie boycotts.

CCPHA's president even suggested that the Environmental Protection Agency should define some restaurants as "environmental toxins." But the real toxic element here is an unhealthy, activist-driven public obsession with "junk" food, which redirects energies away from programs that encourage exercise -- and toward ineffective government control of our food choices.

TRICE WHITEFIELD

Senior Research Analyst

Center for Consumer Freedom

Washington, D.C.



RSS Feed   Print Story   E-mail Story      Add to My Yahoo!   


Open Calais

Advertisement