The scene that greeted Raymond Aguilar in his old Stockton neighborhood on his release from prison four months ago was too familiar: boarded-up windows, liquor stores, prostitutes and gang members walking the streets. Twenty-five years had passed since his conviction for second-degree murder, and nothing had changed.

He was 16 when he shot dead a man he says robbed his grandmother. San Joaquin County prosecutors filed Aguilar’s case in adult court, and he was transferred from a juvenile detention facility to state prison after his conviction at age 17.

Now 41, with a job and a new life, he wonders if he could have rehabilitated himself sooner if he had been tried in juvenile court and confined in a youth facility rather than in a prison full of hardened criminals.

“I started out in (the California) Youth Authority, but when I went to the penitentiary, it was like night and day. There was no hope after that. I thought, ‘You’re going to die in here,’” said Aguilar, who was released under a 2014 law that gave inmates convicted of crimes committed before they were 18 a chance at parole.

Proponents of Proposition 57, a statewide measure on next week’s ballot, say Aguilar’s case illustrates the need to end prosecutors’ power to decide whether suspects as young as 14 are tried as adults. Instead, they say, juvenile cases that qualify for adult court should be vetted by a judge.

That proposed change to the juvenile justice system is the less known, and least controversial, provision of Proposition 57, which also would expand parole opportunities for nonviolent adult offenders. It would reverse part of a ballot measure voters passed in 2000 that gave prosecutors the authority to file charges against minors directly in adult court, without a judge’s review.

Before that measure took effect, only judges could move juveniles to adult court. Judges can take the time to hold hearings, weigh factors such as family and criminal histories and consider the best options for rehabilitation, potentially saving communities the costs of long-term incarceration, youth advocates say.

By comparison, prosecutors typically have only 48 hours after an arrest to file a case. Youth advocates say that’s too little time for such a weighty decision about a young person.

“We believe that if we remove that power from prosecutors we can create more opportunities for young people to stay in the juvenile system, to get the help that they need,” said attorney Frankie Guzman of the Oakland-based National Center for Youth Law, an advocacy group that supports Proposition 57. “A judge, I think, is more interested in balancing the needs of the public and the youth.”

Proposition 57 is opposed by most law enforcement agencies, notably the California District Attorneys Association, which prepared a lengthy analysis of the measure.

“The number of minors transferred to adult court will most likely plummet,” the analysis says. “This result would have significant public safety consequences for California.”

The prosecutors say the initiative could apply retroactively to cases that are on appeal or otherwise unresolved. They’re also concerned that some cases involving violent crimes, such as murder or rape, would no longer qualify automatically for adult court.

And they argue that direct filing saves time and money by efficiently shifting the most hardened juvenile criminals to adult court.

“The acts they committed are adult acts, and (adult court) is where they would end up, anyway,” said Susan Kang Schroeder, chief of staff for Orange County District Attorney Tony Rackauckas.

By contrast, Guzman said eliminating prosecutors’ direct filing authority would correct “abuse of power and miscarriage of justice.”

Guzman, who helped write the initiative, helped conduct research that found allowing prosecutors to “direct file” disproportionately affects Latinos and African-Americans. The research showed that six counties filed more than half of the 492 juvenile cases that went directly to adult court in 2015, and their suspects were overwhelmingly minorities.

Thirteen counties directly filed cases involving African-American or Latino youths, and no whites. For example, Orange County prosecutors “direct filed” 45 juvenile cases last year, 41 of them involving Latinos, none involving whites.

Schroeder said she was surprised to hear those statistics.

“When we’re working on the analysis in a case, we often don’t even know what race the defendant is,’ she said. “That’s the last thing on our mind.”

Numerous studies show that long-term incarceration has been ineffective in reducing recidivism — relapses into crime — among young offenders. Nationwide, minors prosecuted as adults are about 35 percent more likely to be re-arrested than those who remain in the juvenile system, according to the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Bonnie Dankert, a teacher for more than 30 years, taught at Santa Cruz County Juvenile Hall. Daniel Mendoza is one of her success stories.

Mendoza was 14 when he participated in a gang attack that resulted in the beating death of a transient man in Watsonville. Mendoza was charged with first-degree murder and held at Santa Cruz County Juvenile Hall while his case made its way through the adult court system.

“I was stuck in this gang mentality, thinking, ‘There’s no hope for me. I’m just going to keep on doing what I’m doing,’ ” Mendoza said in a recent interview.

Dankert’s classes helped him realize he had options. She invited local artists to teach mural painting and the work of Diego Rivera and David Siqueiros. She taught the works of John Steinbeck and contemporary writers such as Reginald Dwayne Betts, author of “A Question of Freedom: A Memoir of Learning, Survival, and Coming of Age in Prison.”

Tradespeople came to talk about their jobs. College students helped inmates with their writing.

Mendoza was hooked, requesting books and taking online courses. At 19, he was released from juvenile hall, following a plea bargain and a determination that he was no longer a threat to public safety. Today, he has a job at UPS and is an honors student at the University of California, Davis.

“I was fortunate to be given the services that I got, to have people care about what happened to me,” said Mendoza.

Aguilar, having spent most of his youth in prison, now works for Boys and Men of Color in Stockton, talking to young people about his experiences, hoping to inspire them to consider the consequences of their actions.

“One bad choice,” he tells them, “can affect the rest of your life.”

Minerva Canto is a Southern California freelance journalist and a contributor to CALmatters.org — a nonprofit news venture devoted to covering state policy and politics in California.

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.